D on size size Brown cowgirl 5 or 10 Cowboy 12 boots Brown 0dwSZqw D on size size Brown cowgirl 5 or 10 Cowboy 12 boots Brown 0dwSZqw D on size size Brown cowgirl 5 or 10 Cowboy 12 boots Brown 0dwSZqw D on size size Brown cowgirl 5 or 10 Cowboy 12 boots Brown 0dwSZqw D on size size Brown cowgirl 5 or 10 Cowboy 12 boots Brown 0dwSZqw
No name brand found



No size label....measurements are comparable to a label size 10.5 D (mens)....which should fit a lady size 12.Please check the measurements below to insure the very best fit for you.



These are fun vintage western boots! They can literally go with almost anything in your closet! They are a great looking brown leather with a matching 4 thread stitched design. This pair will only look better and better the more they are worn.



They are in good vintage condition with the typical signs of wear. They have scuffs n scrapes at the toes and around the edges. The soles are worn down a bit at the toes. The heel caps are rounded from wear.



I offer an easy return policy.



total height: 14.75"



heel height: 1.5'



insole: 12"....has a bit of a pointy toe



ball of foot: just under 3.75"
Early View
Shoes Suede Wedged Wedge 70's Leather Leather Leather 70s and Vintage Mules Heels WZEPx0wwn
CONTEXT

State legislation restricting access to abortion in the clinic setting raises the possibility that an increasing number of individuals in the United States will self‐manage their abortion at home. Medications sourced online represent a potential pathway to abortion self‐management. Yet, very little is known about the reasons U.S. residents may seek abortion online or their experiences finding medications and information.

METHODS

In January–June 2017, anonymous in‐depth interviews were conducted with 32 people from 20 states who sought abortion medications online (30 women and two men seeking medications for their partners). Participants were asked about their (or their partners’) motivations for considering self‐managed abortion, the sources of medications they identified and any other methods they considered. Transcripts were coded and analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed four key themes: Seeking abortion medications online can be a response to clinic access barriers both in states with and in ones without restrictive abortion laws; self‐managed abortion can be a preference over clinical care; online options offer either information or medications, but not both; and the lack of trusted online options can delay care and lead to consideration of ineffective or unsafe alternatives.

CONCLUSION

Current online options for abortion medications leave many important needs unmet, particularly for women who encounter barriers to obtaining clinic‐based abortion services. There is a public health justification to reduce clinic access barriers and to make medication abortion that is sourced online and managed at home as safe and supported as possible.

Authors' Affiliations

Abigail R.A. Aiken is assistant professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, and faculty research associate, Population Research Center; Kathleen Broussard is a graduate student, Department of Sociology, and graduate research trainee, Population Research Center; Dana M. Johnson is a graduate student, LBJ School of Public Affairs; and Elisa Padron is an undergraduate student, College of Natural Sciences—all at the University of Texas at Austin.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.