stacked red and Womens Boots western stitching fashion wood heels FRYE Vintage green YnRXwqvqx stacked red and Womens Boots western stitching fashion wood heels FRYE Vintage green YnRXwqvqx stacked red and Womens Boots western stitching fashion wood heels FRYE Vintage green YnRXwqvqx stacked red and Womens Boots western stitching fashion wood heels FRYE Vintage green YnRXwqvqx stacked red and Womens Boots western stitching fashion wood heels FRYE Vintage green YnRXwqvqx
Frye brand







label size 7 B (womens) -- please check the measurements below to insure the very best fit for you!







These are fun western style boots. They are just super cute! They have a great broken in look to them! They are a gorgeous super light tan color with an amazing stitched design of red and green threads.







They have tall wood stacked heels.







They are in worn condition with the typical signs of wear. The light color of these boots makes them show more scuffing and water staining than normal. They have the usual scrapes at the toes. There are signs of scuffing all around the boots. The right side of the right boot (on the foot) shows 3 weird markings......zoom in on picture #3 and you should be able to see them. The little heel caps look like they are separating from the heels, but they seem to be on there pretty good.











I do offer a generous return policy if you are not happy with your purchase.







total height: 14"







heel height: 3"







insole: 9.75"







ball of foot: 3"
Early View
red tennis sneakers ladybug 7 slippers 9 sneaker house slippers ladybug Womens slippers crochet black shoes Crocheted ladybug shoe ladybug 8wq0Tppd
CONTEXT

State legislation restricting access to abortion in the clinic setting raises the possibility that an increasing number of individuals in the United States will self‐manage their abortion at home. Medications sourced online represent a potential pathway to abortion self‐management. Yet, very little is known about the reasons U.S. residents may seek abortion online or their experiences finding medications and information.

METHODS

In January–June 2017, anonymous in‐depth interviews were conducted with 32 people from 20 states who sought abortion medications online (30 women and two men seeking medications for their partners). Participants were asked about their (or their partners’) motivations for considering self‐managed abortion, the sources of medications they identified and any other methods they considered. Transcripts were coded and analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed four key themes: Seeking abortion medications online can be a response to clinic access barriers both in states with and in ones without restrictive abortion laws; self‐managed abortion can be a preference over clinical care; online options offer either information or medications, but not both; and the lack of trusted online options can delay care and lead to consideration of ineffective or unsafe alternatives.

CONCLUSION

Current online options for abortion medications leave many important needs unmet, particularly for women who encounter barriers to obtaining clinic‐based abortion services. There is a public health justification to reduce clinic access barriers and to make medication abortion that is sourced online and managed at home as safe and supported as possible.

Authors' Affiliations

Abigail R.A. Aiken is assistant professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, and faculty research associate, Population Research Center; Kathleen Broussard is a graduate student, Department of Sociology, and graduate research trainee, Population Research Center; Dana M. Johnson is a graduate student, LBJ School of Public Affairs; and Elisa Padron is an undergraduate student, College of Natural Sciences—all at the University of Texas at Austin.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.